(Comments: re)
(Votes: +1)
Line 18: Line 18:
{{vote|Yes|sig={{User:Gourra/Sig2}} 23:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)||Fandyllic}}
{{vote|Yes|sig={{User:Gourra/Sig2}} 23:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)||Fandyllic}}
{{vote|Yes|{{User:WoWWiki-Murph/Sig}} 05:40, 1 January 2009 (UTC)|Fandyllic}}
{{vote|Yes|{{User:WoWWiki-Murph/Sig}} 05:40, 1 January 2009 (UTC)|Fandyllic}}
{{vote|Yes|{{User:Armagone/Sig}} ~~|Fandyllic}}
;<span style="color:#CC4444;">No</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|No|~~ ~~|optional comment}} below (remove space between "~ ~")-->
;<span style="color:#CC4444;">No</span>: <!-- Add: {{vote|No|~~ ~~|optional comment}} below (remove space between "~ ~")-->

Revision as of 14:03, January 1, 2009

See the Village Pump for terms and conditions, described by Gil (talk)@fandom. This vote is about the domain of the website, being discussed primarily for advertising/funding concerns, potentially the very future of the wiki. The primary discussion of the topic can also be found at the Village Pump.

Vote yes if you would like to keep the current domain ( If you vote yes, please nominate or support an existing nomination as a representative.

Vote no if you would allow wowwiki to move to a wikia domain (*



  1. Yes Sky (t · c · w) 21:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC) - (See response in discussion.)
  2. Yes PcjGamepedia wiki manager (TDrop me a line!

C58,977 contributions and counting) 23:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC) - (Fandyllic)

  1. Yes User:Gourra/Sig2 23:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC) - (Fandyllic)
  2. Yes Murph (talkcontr) 05:40, 1 January 2009 (UTC) - (Fandyllic)
  3. Yes Trainergossipicon Armagone (Gossipgossipicon Bindergossipicon ~~ - (Fandyllic)
  1. Neutral Howbizr (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC) - (Nominated)
  2. Neutral Ragestorm (talk · contr) 18:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC) - (no comment)


I'm alright with either direction, but I didn't get that impression from everyone else. So if the community decides to stay with our current domain, I'd like to nominate Gengar orange 22x22 Fandyllic (talk · contr), if he would accept the responsibility, to be our non-Wikia representative. -Howbizr (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't care either way, but I concur that Fandyllic and either PCJ or Sandwichman should be representatives.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 18:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I also concur with Fandyllic, and think I'd probably lean more toward Murph, for having gotten this whole thing started as well as the spirit of finding the middle ground. --Sky (t · c · w) 21:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Since Gil mentioned 1 or 2 reps, should we pursue that course of action, I'll second Murph as well. -Howbizr (talk) 22:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
While I am honored and understand why the representatives are being chosen, I have little idea what I would actually do if selected. That said, I third Murph, second Pcj, and also nominate Gourra.--SWM2448 23:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I honestly wasn't looking for an official position for myself in this, but I'm happy to accept the nomination, and do my best to represent the community. I'd like there to be at least 2 of us in this role, as it's a controversial subject and really needs more than one person to carry the responsibility. Two reps is probably sufficient, although I've no objections to there being a 3rd, and I can't see Wikia objecting to that if it's presented as a team that will endeavour to present a consistent message. I've nominated Fandyllic above, although I'd be happy to work with any of the admins on this, if selected. --Murph (talkcontr) 05:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.