See WoWWiki:Requests for adminship/Nominations archive for the archive of previous nominations.

Nominations for adminship

NOTE: Please put your nominations (along with some reasons) below this line.



  • Very familiar with Wiki formatting
  • Experience with Wiki Administration through past guild websites
  • Has a lot of time on his hands

Taurolyon (talk) 06:02, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments on this candidate

  • Undecided - Though there's a long history with the site, it would be nice to see some edits along the lines of new pages and major updates, as well as an increase in number of edits; i.e. more consistent editing pattern. The latter is by no means a deal-breaker, but it would be nice to see more of the former to properly gauge editing ability. Raylan13@fandom (talk) 17:14, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
  • Undecided - Generally high quality edits and good edit summaries. Needs to make more new pages of all types (items, mobs, NPCs, guides, etc.). On the road to having the chops to be an admin, but not quite there yet. --Gengar orange 22x22Beware the sneaky smile! Fandyllic (talk · contr) 11 Feb 2011 2:08 PM Pacific
  • Thanks - I'd like to thank you both for the consideration! I'll be devoting more time to edits and page creations. Taurolyon (talk) 20:45, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Nomination failed

Judging by the lack of any updates in two years, i'm going to assume that the nomination has failed. PacmanNomNomNom Macrophager (talk) 06:24, March 4, 2013 (UTC)


Reasons for nomination:

  • I have experience with creating and editing NPC, Mob, Achievement, Quest, Item, Object and Instance pages.
  • I am very dedicated to do as much as I can to improve and contribute to WoWWiki.
  • I am calm, rational, polite and open to suggestions.
  • I currently have over 1500 edits.

PacmanNomNomNom Macrophager (talk) 04:47, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments on this candidate

  • Support Consistent editor, despite school schedule. Takes direction/suggestions well and remains calm when dealing with other editors. Has expanded types of pages edited after receiving feedback. Might need some direction with new admin tools, but no reservations... despite being Canadian. Winky Raylan13@fandom (talk) 06:46, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support Learns quickly, is careful, and asks good questions. He's Canadian!? (hmmm... my dad is Canadian and he seems okay most of the time...) I guess I can live with that. Barring some unforeseen opposition from other users, RyanPT is good admin material. --Gengar orange 22x22Beware the sneaky smile! Fandyllic (talk · contr) 31 Jan 2013 5:31 PM Pacific

Nomination confirmed

Congratulations! I'm guessing Raylan and I said all the right things, because no one had anything to add. --Gengar orange 22x22Beware the sneaky smile! Fandyllic (talk · contr) 6 Feb 2013 12:36 PM Pacific


Reasons for nomination:

  • He currently has 1800+ edits.
  • Is a Lore Expert, Patroller, and Moderator, and has used those responsibilities very well.
  • Takes initiative - especially during BlizzCon, was one of those who made the rest of our job easier
  • Takes direction well; so though he may not have a huge amount of experience with overall template use, this indicates he's got a history of paying attention and learning
  • Has always been level-headed and professional. Raylan13@fandom (talk) 23:41, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments on this candidate

  • Support Obviously due to above reasons. Is tenacious against vandals as well. Lore videos are also a plus Winky Templates would be a weak spot, but I don't see that as a make or break issue due to his personality and willingness to learn when needed.
  • Adding to the above, I do have a fairly good understanding of World of Warcraft lore, so this helps with the continuity of articles and ensuring they stay up to date. Obviously using templates would help, but as most of my edits concern lore articles this should be ok. Tankingmage (talk) 00:11, December 4, 2013 (UTC)

Please do not edit below this line.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.