@DeletedUser40286997 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Should we either put back the tables in this page or remove them from the [[Battle Stance]] and [[Defensive Stance]] pages? All three pages should have a similar format IMO. |
||
| − | {{#data:itemtip |
||
| + | [[User:GolanTrevize|GolanTrevize]] ([[User talk:GolanTrevize|talk]]) 10:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |name=Deathspeaker Zealot's Helm |
||
| + | :I agree that all three pages should retain their common format. Personally I prefer the tables. They contain a lot more information, saving time spent mousing over abilities and providing all the info you need at a glance; even mousing won't show you the trainable level. The tables are also a common feature of ability pages throughout the site - eg [[Warrior abilities]], [[Priest abilities]], [[Death knight abilities]] - as well as all talents pages - eg [[Warrior talents]], etc - and it seems strange to intentionally make these pages inconsistent with the rest of the site. Finally, I think they look better :P So I'd have to say I think we should stick with the tables, for all the above reasons. -- [[User:Taohinton|Taohinton]] ([[User talk:Taohinton|talk]]) 13:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |quality=epic |
||
| + | ::If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --{{User:Gourra/Sig2}} 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |icon=inv_helmet_158 |
||
| + | :::Done :) |
||
| − | |bind=BoP |
||
| + | :::Took me a while, what with my tendency to update and edit almost every vaguely associated talent and ability along the way, but the page should now be fully up-to-date. I'll do the same for the [[Battle Stance]] and [[Defensive Stance]] pages shortly. -- [[User:Taohinton|Taohinton]] ([[User talk:Taohinton|talk]]) 18:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |slot=Head |
||
| − | |type=Plate |
||
| − | |armor=2059 |
||
| − | |strength=120 |
||
| − | |stamina=216 |
||
| − | |blue-sockets=1 |
||
| − | |meta-sockets=1 |
||
| − | |sockbonus=+8 Critical Strike Rating |
||
| − | |durability=100 |
||
| − | |crit=95 |
||
| − | |haste=68 |
||
| − | |level=80 |
||
| − | |ilvl=251 |
||
| − | |sellprice=131485 |
||
| − | |itemid=50779}} |
||
| − | {{heroic}} |
||
| − | == Source == |
||
| − | This item drops from [[Lady Deathwhisper]] in the 10-man version of [[Icecrown Citadel (instance)|Icecrown Citadel]]. |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Patch changes == |
||
| − | * {{Patch 3.3.0|note=Added.}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | == External links == |
||
| − | <!-- Read http://www.wowpedia.org/Wowpedia:External_links before posting your links here. |
||
| − | Links that do not conform to the rules will be DELETED. |
||
| − | Repeat violations may result in a BAN. |
||
| − | Have a nice day. :) --> |
||
| − | {{Elinks-item|50779}} |
||
| − | [[Category:World of Warcraft epic items]] |
||
| − | [[Category:World of Warcraft plate head items]] |
||
| − | [[Category:World of Warcraft socketed items]] |
||
| − | [[Category:Icecrown Citadel items]] |
||
Latest revision as of 18:33, 17 September 2011
Should we either put back the tables in this page or remove them from the 
[Battle Stance] and 
[Defensive Stance] pages? All three pages should have a similar format IMO.
GolanTrevize (talk) 10:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that all three pages should retain their common format. Personally I prefer the tables. They contain a lot more information, saving time spent mousing over abilities and providing all the info you need at a glance; even mousing won't show you the trainable level. The tables are also a common feature of ability pages throughout the site - eg Warrior abilities, Priest abilities, Death knight abilities - as well as all talents pages - eg Warrior talents, etc - and it seems strange to intentionally make these pages inconsistent with the rest of the site. Finally, I think they look better :P So I'd have to say I think we should stick with the tables, for all the above reasons. -- Taohinton (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --g0urra[T҂C] 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done :)
- Took me a while, what with my tendency to update and edit almost every vaguely associated talent and ability along the way, but the page should now be fully up-to-date. I'll do the same for the [Battle Stance] and [Defensive Stance] pages shortly. -- Taohinton (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --g0urra[T҂C] 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)