mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Should we either put back the tables in this page or remove them from the [[Battle Stance]] and [[Defensive Stance]] pages? All three pages should have a similar format IMO. |
||
| − | {{Stub/Cataclysm}} |
||
| + | [[User:GolanTrevize|GolanTrevize]] ([[User talk:GolanTrevize|talk]]) 10:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | {{ss||Deadmines}} |
||
| + | :I agree that all three pages should retain their common format. Personally I prefer the tables. They contain a lot more information, saving time spent mousing over abilities and providing all the info you need at a glance; even mousing won't show you the trainable level. The tables are also a common feature of ability pages throughout the site - eg [[Warrior abilities]], [[Priest abilities]], [[Death knight abilities]] - as well as all talents pages - eg [[Warrior talents]], etc - and it seems strange to intentionally make these pages inconsistent with the rest of the site. Finally, I think they look better :P So I'd have to say I think we should stick with the tables, for all the above reasons. -- [[User:Taohinton|Taohinton]] ([[User talk:Taohinton|talk]]) 13:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | {{npcbox |
||
| + | ::If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --{{User:Gourra/Sig2}} 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | | faction = Combat |
||
| + | :::Done :) |
||
| − | | name = Vanessa VanCleef |
||
| + | :::Took me a while, what with my tendency to update and edit almost every vaguely associated talent and ability along the way, but the page should now be fully up-to-date. I'll do the same for the [[Battle Stance]] and [[Defensive Stance]] pages shortly. -- [[User:Taohinton|Taohinton]] ([[User talk:Taohinton|talk]]) 18:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | | image = Vanessa VanCleef.jpg |
||
| − | | title = Defias Kingpin |
||
| − | | gender = Female |
||
| − | | race = Human |
||
| − | | creature = Humanoid |
||
| − | | level = |
||
| − | | type = Boss |
||
| − | | health = |
||
| − | | money = <!-- {{Cost|4|7|25}} --> |
||
| − | | aggro = <!-- {{Aggro|-1|1}} --> |
||
| − | | repfaction = |
||
| − | | location = [[Deadmines]] |
||
| − | | instance = Deadmines |
||
| − | }} |
||
| − | {{for|character biography|Vanessa VanCleef}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | '''Vanessa VanCleef''' is the final boss of the [[Deadmines]]. |
||
| − | |||
| − | == External links == |
||
| − | {{Elinks-NPC}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | {{DEFAULTSORT:VanCleef, Vanessa}} |
||
Latest revision as of 18:33, 17 September 2011
Should we either put back the tables in this page or remove them from the 
[Battle Stance] and 
[Defensive Stance] pages? All three pages should have a similar format IMO.
GolanTrevize (talk) 10:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that all three pages should retain their common format. Personally I prefer the tables. They contain a lot more information, saving time spent mousing over abilities and providing all the info you need at a glance; even mousing won't show you the trainable level. The tables are also a common feature of ability pages throughout the site - eg Warrior abilities, Priest abilities, Death knight abilities - as well as all talents pages - eg Warrior talents, etc - and it seems strange to intentionally make these pages inconsistent with the rest of the site. Finally, I think they look better :P So I'd have to say I think we should stick with the tables, for all the above reasons. -- Taohinton (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --g0urra[T҂C] 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done :)
- Took me a while, what with my tendency to update and edit almost every vaguely associated talent and ability along the way, but the page should now be fully up-to-date. I'll do the same for the [Battle Stance] and [Defensive Stance] pages shortly. -- Taohinton (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --g0urra[T҂C] 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)