Revision as of 16:52, December 16, 2006 by Weremagnus (Talk | contribs)

| User:Weremagnus


Thank you for your interest in the Bookkeepers. Unfotunately, you do not have enough experience here at the wiki to be accepted at this time. However, your have demonstrated knowledge of Standard Written English and signing posts, and your experience is acceptable. Your name will be added to my short-list of Bookkeeper potentials, which means that your application will be accepted when you reach the appropriate level of experience. In the meantime, keep contirbuting, and I will be in touch. --Ragestorm, Head Bookkeeper

Thanks Ragestorm! I'll be sure to keep adding and working where I can around the Wiki! :) --Magnus 11:05, 3 September 2006 (EDT)
If you're still interested, I deem your experience enough to join the Bookkeepers. Don't get too excited- no special health benefits or parking spaces, just a cheesy title and the occasional order from me. And in light of your conversation with his lordship of the 22,000+ below, keep away from the categories, eh? ;-P --Ragestorm 10:24, 14 October 2006 (EDT)
I'm of course still interested, I'd be happy to join with the Bookkeepers! Hahaha and yeah, I'm going to leave categories to the category crew. :P --Magnus 12:00, 14 October 2006 (EDT)
Excellent. I've got about ten things at once to do, so I'll give you details and hierarchy a bit later. Welcome aboard. --Ragestorm 12:30, 14 October 2006 (EDT)
Sounds good to me! --Magnus 00:23, 26 October 2006 (EDT)

Did you make those no photo things, or were you modifying? Either way, excellent job! We'll need one for dragons...--Ragestorm 21:53, 26 October 2006 (EDT)

I've been making them, and I will be sure to upload one for all of the main races and the primary creatures that will probably need them. :) --Magnus 22:09, 26 October 2006 (EDT)
=) excellent. This will definetly streamline things. I've also got Succession boxes and a few other infobox ideas on the agenda as well. --Ragestorm 23:07, 26 October 2006 (EDT)
Sorry to shout orders at you, but I've noticed several times that we need a nopic for female elves. Would you mind?--Ragestorm 22:38, 11 December 2006 (EST)


Be certain the categories you change are the correct ones. You added Category:Beasts and Category:NPCs to some named wolves, but these are incorrect. Category:Wolves is a specific subcategory of Beasts, making the latter redundant, and Category:Named Mobs is a better fit to these creatures, since they are non-interactive and exist for the purpose of being killed. When in doubt, click the category you wish to change, and read the description posted there before changing. -- Varghedin 20:31, 12 Sept 2006 (CET)

History of Warcraft

Excellent work formatting the History of Warcraft articles with a standard boilerplate. They look great and are much more accessible.--Aeleas 01:57, 14 October 2006 (EDT)


I feel I should mention - the background colour of the wiki is #333333 - your PNGs such as Image:Whelps.png seem to have a darker background. They look good though! :) -- Kirkburn (talk) 15:39, 22 October 2006 (EDT)

Thanks for pointing that out, I'll be sure to fix it! :) --Magnus 00:23, 26 October 2006 (EDT)
I just wanted to say that your transparent images with shadows look so nice - how do you do them? But also, I wanted to add that the image you made for Beast is very cool, but it's so large it covers up several of the names on the list of beasts, you might want to fix it. --Presea 22:13, 11 December 2006 (EST)
Hey! I do them with the model viewer and Photoshop and just turn them into pngs with transparency. The shadow and all that's done in Photoshop. As for the beast page, I think I'll just put the image below the list since its going to vary depending on the resolution of the viewer's monitor. Thanks for pointing it out though! :) --Magnus 22:47, 11 December 2006 (EST)


Hi there ! I'd just like to know how you could tell the classes the Tuskarr may play. Thanks !--K ) (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2006 (EST)

Making an estimated assumption based on the unit types/names used in WarCraft III. Tuskarr, There have been fighters and healing/sorcerer classes, so like I said it's based off of what vague information WC3: FT has given us. :) --Magnus 23:08, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Right ! But still the sorcerer doesn't meet my requirements :P well thank you again.--K ) (talk) 05:39, 16 December 2006 (EST)
Alright, that's cool. I placed the info there as more of a placeholder too when boxing the race information, so if it's deemed removable, please go right ahead. --Magnus 11:52, 16 December 2006 (EST)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.