Forum:Glyph pages update/Sandbox

Forums: Village pump → Glyph pages update

Ok, I started to update the Warrior articles a little while back, and it’s slowly growing into the mammoth task of updating the Class articles as a whole! Anyway I have just updated this article; Warrior_glyphs and would like your thoughts please – I think it’s much clearer than the original (have a look here Warlock glyphs for how all the pages are laid out at the moment) If I get positive feed back will update them all in a similar fashion. Wren (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

--Wren (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

I like the idea of having the left-most column span all of the primes, then span all of the majors, etc. Mage glyphs was done a bit differently by adding in the effect as a last column. I think it would be really cool to put the two ideas together. D.D. Corkum (T / C) 18:06, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I've changed Mage glyphs to reflect some of the work you did, notably the left column. D.D. Corkum (T / C) 23:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok done Hunter glyphs it looks much better I believe! Wren (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

• ✓ Death knight glyphs
• ✓ Druid glyphs
• ✓ Hunter glyphs
• ✓ Mage glyphs
• ✓ Paladin glyphs
• ✓ Priest glyphs
• _ Rogue glyphs
• _ Shaman glyphs
• _ Warlock glyphs
• ✓ Warrior glyphs

Add the checkmark (✓ → ✓), if you've updated it. -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 4:08 PM PST 29 Nov 2010

Request for no subcategories version

Ok had some comments on the updated glyph pages, some people would prefer the glyphs not to have sub categories (i.e. Holy/Protection/Retribution) have a look at User:Wren/test4 and tell me what you prefer. Wren (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

I like the 2nd. At least for Priests, there are a few glyphs which are good for all 3 talent specs (shadowfiend, levitate, etc), which shouldn't be pigeonholed into 'Shadow' or 'Disc' when its good for any spec. Ressy (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to change Priests to the 2nd version if theres no objection. Ressy (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

How about making the table transcluded, but you can pass a variable setting to make it show the subcategories or not... See Forum:Glyph_pages_update/Sandbox. You could make the default table show the subcategories version and have a link to it, but transclude the no subcategories version on the page.

This way you could have both versions, but only maintain one table. Does this make sense? -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 2:33 PM PST 3 Dec 2010