Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Advertisement

Untitled[]

I think this page should be deleted. Urok is his first name. Also in the quests he seems to be connected or part of the Spirestone clan.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 09:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Urok actually is some kinda organization based on the fact that there are more than one urok in connection with Urok Doomhowl.Baggins (talk) 17:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Ya too bad you don't realize that when other people make pages. I made a page about a group of blood elves, and there are not two NPC's like in Urok's case but there are like 8 NPC's with the name. You then put a "citation needed" on it when it is in the game. Play the game more often.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 23:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
News flash: telling us "it's in the game" isn't enough, you still have to cite it.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Ya I just asked on another talk page, how in the world do you cite something in the game?  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 23:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Generally, the problem doesn't arise, but [citation needed]  will do. If you're quoting a specific quest or in-game text, allude to it in the wording of the passage. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 00:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Also additionally you must make sure that if you cite something, that you cite it correctly, and avoid making stuff up to fill in the gaps. That is avoid getting too detailed about something if there is no details whatsoever to give. Avoid making assumptions based off of something else, since two seperate topics aren't necessarily connected, no matter what assumptions you might have on the issue. You could for example cite "bloodwarders" and yes units called bloodwardes exist, but the assumption that bloodwarders are members of a specific blood elf faction may only be speculation, when there is evidence of their being bloodwarders under several other blood elf factions based on npc namesBaggins (talk) 00:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

You just assumed Urok was a group when there are only 2 NPCs in the game. Bloodwarders have 16 NPCs, come on.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Isn't [citation needed]  almost the same at putting the WoW tag in a page?  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 00:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

We actually frown upon the [citation needed]  usage, we actually have a ref games template built specifically for use for the games. Let me find it for you.Baggins (talk) 00:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Delete[]

This isn't a group. He is part of the Spirestone clan. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 10:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Where is it told? I want the source so that I can clean this mess. Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Well in my view that is what it looks like. Just read the pages N [60] Urok Doomhowl (quest), Urok Doomhowl (NPC), and Inv scroll 08 [Warosh's Scroll] (a 5 page scroll) and maybe you might find something different. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 02:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
It appears that Highlord Omokk is the muscle and Urok Doomhowl the brain, but yeah they appear to be from the spirestone clan. Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 05:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
This is further reinforced by Urok's dungeon journal entry. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 06:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Advertisement