What evidence is there to prove that Remulos is not one of the three sons of Cenarius mentioned in the legend? It seemed to make sense to me that Remulos is "the Keeper" mentioned in the night elf legend, and that Zaetar is "the Centaur", since we already know at least some of the centaur tribes derive from him. Is there any evidence that disproves that?

~ Grudgham


Keeper Remulos was wandering around Orgrimmar the other day (4/10/08), and seemed to be immune to every type of attack. He was wandering in and out of houses, not attacking anyone who attacked him. We could damage him, but he'd recover almost instantly. It was obviously a bug, but what could have drawn him so far away from Moonglade? --Yuvorias (talk) 08:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Stag party? TherasTaneel (talk) 18:05, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Most Powerful Druid?

In the article it says that he is "perhaps the most powerful druid in the world." I thought that Malfurion was stronger, or for sure Cenarius. No doubt he is a powerful druid, but the most powerful? jclipps (talk) 02:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Cenarius would not fall under the category "in the world". And as far as Malfurion goes it could be a toss up. I'd bet on Malfurion but the passage says "perhaps" so theres really no issue with it.Warthok Talk Contribs 04:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Add a meaningful name explanation

According to legend, Remulos was the brother of Romulos, the founder of Rome. At an age of which this editor's knowing of which escapes his grasp of dates, Remulos and Romulos were abandoned and raised by wolves. Eventually Romulos killed Remulos for reasons that this contributer forgets as well.--The last Alterac (talk) 11:53, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Their name are Romulus and Remus, not Remulos and Romulos, beside, Remulos did not kill Zaetar. And Remus was killed when he leapt across the trench his brother drew (nothing is lost about it, thought reasons vary).
Where is your point?
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 11:58, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
Can you seriously blame me for making factual errors? When I can barely recall what my source actually said?
Point being: forgetfulness FTW! --The last Alterac (talk) 12:24, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
Next time, try checking before editing maybe? :p
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 12:41, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, TLA, we *CAN* blame you for making factual errors, and this isn't the first time you've made an edit without checking your sources that turned out to be wrong. Most people would have learned something by now. Instead, you're trying to claim that you're not to blame for screwing up because of your own laziness. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:35, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Um... I did learn something, and for your information I did not edit the article, and you know what I did instead? I asked a fucking question on if this is worth the edit.

A simply "no" would of been sufficient.--The last Alterac (talk) 10:38, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

But it's a question you could have answered for yourself had you bothered to do even the slightest bit of research... Like, say, thirty seconds of searching on Google or Wikipedia. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 11:05, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

But the question was, "Is such and suchus worth mentioning?" and not "Did such and suchos do this?". So that research wouldn't of been helpful because I misspelt "suchos". In other words, not only did I fail history,,, I failed the spelling of historic figures.--The last Alterac (talk) 18:52, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

Move request?

I'm going to go ahead and ask why someone wants this moved, when this is his name in-game. User:Coobra/Sig4 19:42, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't know, but perhaps because of the same policy that got alot of articles moved from their (<title> name) to their (name) a while ago? TherasTaneel (talk) 20:11, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
I guess that's because in books he is refered has Remulos most of the time. And assuming that his full name is "Remulos" we should get rid of the title like we are doing since some times.
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 20:16, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Judging by both histories of the pages [1] [2], they were "moved" between each other a lot... I think a clear decision needs to be made on this particular character to prevent such things in the future. User:Coobra/Sig4 20:23, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
I hate that policy. I was added for a reason, but it just got annoying.--SWM2448 20:49, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
What's up with this policy? It's pretty easy and leaves very few mistakes possibles:
  • Full name is known (often book and/or game characters) ==> remove the title
  • Full name is not known (often game characters only) ==> leave the title
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 20:55, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Although, as I recall, mostly game characters without their full name know got moved, I think I agree with that the policy is ok, but working as intended? TherasTaneel (talk) 21:00, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
And here's where it gets sticky... Queen Azshara, Queen is just a title, so should she be moved as well. I'd say no, cause not only of the zone, but it just doesn't sound right to leave the word queen out when referring to her. User:Coobra/Sig4 21:07, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Well Azshara is only called by her first name, like Xavius, but considerning the names of their epoch, they were likely to have a family name which is never mentionned.
But I would hate to see Azshara (character) or Azshara (zone)...
For the NPCs moves, I recall having moved many with what seemed to be a full name (like Velene Starstrike, Dalia Sunblade). If that not enough, do not esitate and revert.
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 21:12, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
I have never actively challenged it because it is just annoying (I did make a small comment once). Does moving an NPC's name to a different page title impede people looking for the NPC? I have minimal data for or against that. Edits like this seem strange to me. It was disambiguated on its own. Look what happens when an entity only has one name and a title. Queen Azshara is not an NPC, but still needs to be disambiguated from the zone, but "Azshara (night elf/queen)" seems unnecessary. Taking this policy to the letter would make "The Prodigal Leader" into "Arthas Menethil (First Legion Forward Camp)" or the like. A'noob, you are a great editor, but you edit a lot, and it is supported by policy, so it is not worth it to revert it.--SWM2448 21:15, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
I become a real bot when I find something to be done on multiple articles xD
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 21:27, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
He has been mentioned in novels as simply Remulos, so I think it's logic to move it to Remulos. For those searching the npc, they still have the redirect from Keeper Remulos.--Lon-ami (talk) 20:35, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
At least until someone fixes all the redirects by turning them into piped links. It can happen. Then, the NPC name may be deleted as an unused redirect. What is to be the fate of every other NPC with just a rank and a name?--SWM2448 21:04, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
No, only NPC with a rank and a name in one piece (Keeper Remulos, Lord Malorne (speculation))
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 21:07, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Leader of the Cenarion Circle?

I read the new novel Stormrage and there it was mentioned that Fandral was the leader of the Cenarion Circle, then followed by Malfurion. Where does it say that Remulos is it's leader? Andreioplst (talk) 13:40, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

He's not and never has been, as far as I know. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 16:47, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.