Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
(→‎More non-changes: new section)
(formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Seal of Corruption bug ==
 
== Seal of Corruption bug ==
   
FYI, don't add this as an undocumented change because it's just a tooltip bug. {{blizz|Ghostcrawler}} stated,
+
FYI, don't add this as an undocumented change because it's just a tooltip bug.
  +
:"{{text|blizz|Seal of Corruption's tooltip incorrectly stated that it did higher damage than it actually did. It actually did (and still does) the same damage as Seal of Vengeance. Vengeance's tooltip did not have the error. We changed Corruption's tooltip to be correct.}}" ([http://blue.mmo-champion.com/28/20126978907-seal-of-corruption-nerfs.html Source]).
 
  +
{{bluepost
{{User:Howbizr/sign}} 2:38 PM, 5 Oct 2009 (EDT)
 
  +
| poster = Ghostcrawler
  +
| link = http://blue.mmo-champion.com/28/20126978907-seal-of-corruption-nerfs.html
  +
| date = 2009-10-02 15:14:19
  +
| title = Re: Seal of Corruption nerfs?
 
| body = {{ability|Seal of Corruption|Seal of Corruption's}} [[tooltip]] incorrectly stated that it did higher damage than it actually did. It actually did (and still does) the same damage as {{ability|Seal of Vengeance}}. Vengeance's tooltip did not have the error. We changed Corruption's tooltip to be correct.
  +
}}
   
 
== Curse of Elements was not changed ==
 
== Curse of Elements was not changed ==
   
Also, don't post this as an undoc either. {{blizz|Ghostcrawler}} says,
+
Also, don't post this as an undoc either.
  +
:"{{text|blizz|Curse of the Elements rank 5 is still 13%... Curse of Elements rank 5 has not changed between 3.2.2 and 3.3.}}" ([http://blue.mmo-champion.com/28/20131899339-why-the-nerf-to-coe.html Source])
 
  +
{{bluepost
{{User:Howbizr/sign}} 2:40 PM, 5 Oct 2009 (EDT)
 
  +
| poster = Ghostcrawler
  +
| link = http://blue.mmo-champion.com/28/20131899339-why-the-nerf-to-coe.html
  +
| date = 2009-10-02 04:52:34
  +
| title = Re: Why the Nerf to CoE?
 
| body = Curse of the Elements rank 5 is still 13%... {{ability|Curse of Elements}} rank 5 has not changed between [[Patch 3.2.2|3.2.2]] and [[Patch 3.3.0|3.3]].
  +
}}
   
 
== The PTR section ==
 
== The PTR section ==

Revision as of 13:55, 6 October 2009

Seal of Corruption bug

FYI, don't add this as an undocumented change because it's just a tooltip bug.

Re: Seal of Corruption nerfs? | 2009-10-02 15:14 | Blizzard Entertainment Ghostcrawler

Spell Holy SealOfVengeance [Seal of Corruption's] tooltip incorrectly stated that it did higher damage than it actually did. It actually did (and still does) the same damage as Spell Holy SealOfVengeance [Seal of Vengeance]. Vengeance's tooltip did not have the error. We changed Corruption's tooltip to be correct.

View original post

Curse of Elements was not changed

Also, don't post this as an undoc either.

Re: Why the Nerf to CoE? | 2009-10-02 04:52 | Blizzard Entertainment Ghostcrawler

Curse of the Elements rank 5 is still 13%... Warlock curse shadow [Curse of the Elements] rank 5 has not changed between 3.2.2 and 3.3.

View original post

The PTR section

Shouldn't everything be in this section until the patch goes live? -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 03:18, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

No. I was thinking of this section, because they are things that are specifically for PTRs, not for live. Hans Kamp (talk) 04:15, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
Another option would be moving everything into an unconfirmed section once the patch goes live. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:47, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
The stuff in Patch 3.3.0 is what Blizzard has published on their website, and should be a direct copy, with the addition of wikilinks and other navigational stuffs. What's on Patch 3.3.0 (undocumented changes) are changes found and confirmed by players. Speculation can go on the talk pages. Ideally, the undoc page should have a lot of a references, since most of these things were confirmed by a blogger or fansite somewhere down the line. But if you do your own research, you're still welcome to post what you find without a reference.
On the flip side, nothing is ever moved to the official patch notes, because again, that's just whatever Blizz officially announced. We do however purge anything from the undoc page if it becomes duplicated on the official patch notes. Hope that helps clarify a bit. /chomp‎ Howbizr(t·c) 1:47 PM, 6 Oct 2009 (EDT)

More non-changes

Here are some other false positives, so they should not be added to the undoc:

Re: Chains of Ice = Diminishing Returns on PTR | 2009-10-05 15:48 | Blizzard Entertainment Ghostcrawler

Stop your mass rerolling there DKs; this is a bug. :)

Spell Frost ChainsOfIce [Chains of Ice] should not have DR on its snare.

The bug was likely introduced because we were trying to prevent the huge visual from displaying on creatures that were immune to the snare. The functionality of Chains of Ice has not changed for 3.3 (at least as of this posting.)

View original post

Re: Reconsider The Improved Barkskin Change | 2009-10-05 21:51 | Blizzard Entertainment Ghostcrawler

Spell nature stoneclawtotem [Improved Barkskin] has not changed for 3.3 (at least as of this posting). The tooltip was clarified to specify that only leather and cloth armor contribute, which was always the case.

View original post

/chomp‎ Howbizr(t·c) 1:51 PM, 6 Oct 2009 (EDT)