I removed it because Lake Wintergrasp does not exist any longer. If you put the category, then it is like saying Lake Wintergrasp exists as an area of Wintergrasp. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 11:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Who has said that Lake Wintergrasp doesn't exist? --User:Gourra/Sig2 11:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Have you read the article and/or been in Wintergrasp? You don't see a "Lake Wintergrasp" name on the map or in the zone. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 11:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Doesn't mean that it doesn't exist, but could mean that it's merely not named yet. --User:Gourra/Sig2 11:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
You are starting to sound like Baggins. Currently, it does not exist. You are correct that this does not mean it will never show up in the future, but that does not mean it exists at the moment. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 11:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Nothing says specifically that Lake Wintergrasp doesn't exist anymore, the southern lake just doesn't have a name. It might be what's left of Lake Wintergrasp for much we know. --User:Gourra/Sig2 12:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For now though, the name does not exist in-game. You can find other lakes in Wintergrasp besides the southern one too. I think it should have a "lore region" category and not a "Wintergrasp" category until we find out more in the future. It might be what is left of Lake Wintergrasp, but it is only speculation at the moment. Rolandius Paladin (talk - contr) 12:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.