Raw Materials[]
Perhaps an organization more like this would be less distracting?
- For the engineer
- 2x [King's Amber]
- 20x [Handful of Cobalt Bolts]
- ~ 20x [Cobalt Bar]
- 8x [Titansteel Bar]
- 2x [Field Repair Bot 74A] (2 sets)
- 32x [Thorium Bar]
- 4x [Fused Wiring] (one set)
- 10x [Field Repair Bot 110G]
- 16x [Adamantite Bar]
- 16x [Handful of Fel Iron Bolts]
- 16x [Fel Iron Bar]
- 2x [Khorium Power Core]
- 2x [Primal Fire]
- 6x [Khorium Bar]
- 20x [Scrapbot Construction Kit] (4 sets)
- 40x [Saronite Bar]
Note: This requires creating 2 recipes worth of [Field Repair Bot 74A], 2 of [Field Repair Bot 110G] and 4 of [Scrapbot Construction Kit]. As bots stack to 20, it may be useful to construct each bot type individually, to require fewer total inventory slots at any one time.
- For the Jewelcrafter
- 6x [Copper Bar]
- For the Miner
- (8x Titansteel Bar)
- 24x [Titanium Bar] or 48x [Titanium Ore]
- 8x [Eternal Fire]
- 8x [Eternal Earth]
- 8x [Eternal Shadow]
- (other bars)
- 12x [Khorium Ore]
- 80x [Saronite Ore]
- ~30x [Cobalt Ore]
- 32x [Adamantite Ore]
- 32x [Fel Iron Ore]
- 32x [Thorium Ore]
- 6x [Copper Ore]
--Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 21:51, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- I like the hierarchy, but I'm wondering if there's some way to make a collapsible tree control in MediaWiki code? I've seen it done in JavaScript, so it's just a question of whether MediaWiki or a 3rd party extension has packaged it. A quick google turned up this extension: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:TreeAndMenu -- ScratchMonkey (talk) 22:44, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe there's a way to leverage transclusion for the intermediate parts, so that higher level assemblies can share the trees of lower level assemblies. -- ScratchMonkey (talk) 22:52, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Just wanted to let you know, Fused Wiring only requires 2 [Essence of Fire] not 4. I went ahead and changed it above. Besides that I think this setup is a lot better than the one on the page currently, I will switch them out now since it has been a few months since this was posted. -- Drewski4747 (talk) 22:52, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I think it might just be better to leave a total sum of the basic materials and leave it at that. This particular page is an article and not a guide IMO. -- Megawizard (talk) 20:27, October 2, 2010 (EST)
- The hierarchy layout is a bit harder to read and follow. The basic materials layout as currently displayed is a lot easier for anyone to look at a glance to see what's needed. Besides, it helps keep consistency throughout the rest of the wiki as the majority of the other recipes are laid out in the non-hierarchy format. SergeantKoopa (talk) 00:37, October 3, 2010 (UTC)