Talk: Hare

Hares are not rabbits. Rolandius (talk - contr) 08:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Close enough to share a category.

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 08:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Well it is not like frogs and toads is it? Do they share the same model like the frogs and toads do? Rolandius

(talk - contr) 08:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

They do intend share the same model... why would they create two models for such little differences. Same with wolves and worgs, frogs and toads, and any other similar creatures.

^{{TDon't hiss at me.•CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.)} 21:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Maybe I am thinking of "skins" then. The hares look like they have longer ears than rabbits. Also, on Wowhead I didn't see a "same model as" for them. Rolandius

(talk - contr) 03:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I guess the category could be rabbits but I still think the race should be hare. Saying a hare is a rabbit is: 1) wrong. 2) saying a lion seal is a sea lion or a hawk is an eagle because they look similiar. Rolandius

(talk - contr) 03:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)