Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Advertisement

This page is a serious mess? Is even half of this related to the subject of "Guild advancement"? It seems like someone just slopped together a list of everything new regarding guilds. CogHammer Ose talk/3721 23:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Look at my edit comment. I just infodumped what happened at the game systems panel. Same thing for the other 4 pages I created out of the blue. --k_d3 00:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup

I cleaned up the page, trying to group it together. I left in some of the information not related to guild advancement but related to new guild mechanics and grouped them together in a "UI Changes" section at the bottom. Feel free to delete this section as the information is disseminated into the proper locations; I didn't want to delete it in case this is the only easily-obtainable reference for such info. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsvoyager (talk · contr).

Much better now :) CogHammer Ose talk/3721 22:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Guild perks

The guild perk pages seem to be a whole mess - some are using {{infobox talent}}, some are using {{infobox ability}}, and most use {{classfooter}}. These templates are NOT used for that but are supposed to be used solely on ability/talent articles. I believe there need to be some kind of boilerplate, since they could need some unique formatting. --g0urra[T҂C] 17:01, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

A new template would be nice I think.
A mix of Achievement (for the display when hovered with the mouse) and ability for the box in the article.
IconSmall Hamuul Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 17:04, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

I actually created all the stub pages. The three perks that are clickable abilities I used the ability boilerplate. The others I used the talent boilerplate because it was the closest thing I could get to a template. The Classfooter I put on there because, without it, the page became a complete mess with the left side and footer divs overlapping the content. Saluce65 (talk) 18:01, July 19, 2010 (UTC)saluce65

Advertisement