Should we either put back the tables in this page or remove them from the 
[Battle Stance] and 
[Defensive Stance] pages? All three pages should have a similar format IMO.
GolanTrevize (talk) 10:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that all three pages should retain their common format. Personally I prefer the tables. They contain a lot more information, saving time spent mousing over abilities and providing all the info you need at a glance; even mousing won't show you the trainable level. The tables are also a common feature of ability pages throughout the site - eg Warrior abilities, Priest abilities, Death knight abilities - as well as all talents pages - eg Warrior talents, etc - and it seems strange to intentionally make these pages inconsistent with the rest of the site. Finally, I think they look better :P So I'd have to say I think we should stick with the tables, for all the above reasons. -- Taohinton (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --g0urra[T҂C] 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done :)
- Took me a while, what with my tendency to update and edit almost every vaguely associated talent and ability along the way, but the page should now be fully up-to-date. I'll do the same for the [Battle Stance] and [Defensive Stance] pages shortly. -- Taohinton (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to keep the tables, then you have to update them. I removed the tables because they were outdated. --g0urra[T҂C] 13:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)