This is a small issue but in the RPG it says it is called "Archmage of Kirin Tor" and not "Archmage of the Kirin Tor". Rolandius 
(talk - contr) 03:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Good catch. Best I can tell that terminology is specifically "Archmage of Kirin Tor" through most of the rpg (though I'm not sure if its grammatically correct, :p), I can't find any specific referebce to "Archmage of the Kirin Tor" listed in any of them, except for the reference to Nilas Aran in the APG.Baggins (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I am not sure if it is grammatically correct saying something like Archmage of Kirin Tor. If your talking to someone about the Kirin Tor then I think people would usually say something like "that mage is part of the Kirin Tor" and not "that mage is part of Kirin Tor" I think. Rolandius
(talk - contr) 04:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I am not sure if it is grammatically correct saying something like Archmage of Kirin Tor. If your talking to someone about the Kirin Tor then I think people would usually say something like "that mage is part of the Kirin Tor" and not "that mage is part of Kirin Tor" I think. Rolandius
Update?:
- Shouldn't the part that says they plot against the forsaken be updated for the new expansion's lore and recent move to dalaran and more?Also could include the war agains the blue dragonflight and the scourge.User:Eity