The damage percentages for the individual ticks appear to be off (they're listed as 57.4%, 100%, 142.59%) A simple test shows them to be (approx) 72%, 100% and 128.5%. Any one able and willing to confirm/deny? --GreatLich 07:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- From my recollection, the breakdown is much simpler, at least for the basic spell without +spell damage. I restored an older version of the damage-per-tick breakdown (clarified some) which matches my experience. -- Harveydrone 20:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Table[]
I restored the table with empty level 1-11 because after level 12 I wanted to add new data for level 13-20. Level 21 will be on the same row as level 1 (and level 41, 61 and 81 ad well). Level 2 will be next to level 2 (and level 42, 62 and 82) and so on. Level 23-25, 43-45, 63-65, 83-85 will be on the same row. After that we will have level 26-40, 46-60, 66-80 will be on the same row as level 6-20. Hans Kamp (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)