Talk:Elemental Unrest

I added the location from the rifts that I found on the WoW forums, I am new to all this, I gave credit in the end, please correct if it was done wrongly. Luxcura (talk) 06:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

It would appear that if all the elementals aren't killed by half-past the hour, they all despawn. This could just be sorry luck on my part, however twice now I've arrived at the spawning point to see them all just fade away. Ariesian (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Was this where, I have this happened to me in a lower level area (Silithus), seems to be a bug, sometimes I see them sometimes they just fade like you say, there has been reports of this all over the place, but I haven't tested further yet Luxcura (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Locations on main page

After some feedback from a number of people, the general consensus is that it's easier to have it all on the one page than have people - especially new people or those unfamiliar with it or disinclined to hunt about - have to go to a second page for the rather pertinent information.

If someone feels it necessary to make a large change to the page in future, please put it up for discussion before you make the change. Berym (talk) 10:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Having multiple copies of this list in different locations on the wiki is a problem, and should be solved regardless of whether this page is actually going to display this list or not.

I don't buy the "let's cater to people who can't be bothered to hunt about" argument when, essentially, hunting about is noticing a line that says something like "You can view the [locations of the rifts here]." Taken to its logical extreme, this is essentially "Let's have all the content on one page, because some people might not see it otherwise," which leads to bad experience for both editors and readers.

If you're going to invoke the words "consensus" and "feedback," you really should link discussions that demonstrate those -- as it stands right now, I can't figure out who, besides you, wants this list here, and for what reasons, which does your position no favours. -- foxlit (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Agreed that multiple copies is redundant, but is a sub page with a link, hidden amongst the text, really the best location to supply pertinent information? The discussions were had offline, hence why I said that it should be talked about here rather than simply done without any form of discussion.

It is not "catering to people who can't be bothered to hunt about", simply a realisation that people are less inclined to use this as a source for information if they have to dig and look for an unremarkable mention that information can be found elsewhere - that is standard usability right there.

This page is not so unnecessarily large that the information shouldn't be here. Shouldn't the information be on the one source that is easiest for people to locate and find?

If it must be moved, clear links to where the information can be found should be put in its place, not the brief and unremarkable mention that was left here previously. It might be tidier having the information sub-sectioned away, but it's less user friendly and adds additional pages when a singular one will be sufficient for the task at hand. -- Berym (talk) 01:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

So, big and bold like it is now with a direct link to the "Locations" section? --k_d³ 02:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Move to "Elemental Unrest"?

As per: http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=27508585253&sid=1 Suzaku (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Given there's an official name, that would make sense; I'm in favour of the move.

At the very least a redirect to make matters easier for people trying to find it. I'll create one now. -- Berym (talk) 01:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

And now they're calling it the Elemental Invasion. [1] I wish they'd make up their minds. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Not going to happen. lolrelol²

Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (^talk/_contribz) 23:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Buffs and Effects

Blaaarrrgghhh, the code has failed me. Does anyone see what I'm trying to do and know how to fix the monstrosity that is my failure? I've got all the info, just don't know how to make the tooltips display. Sulhir (talk) 01:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

There really isn't any point to having a separate page for each buff. They should probably just be listed on the mob pages for the rifts. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 01:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Mob pages, got it.Sulhir (talk) 01:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Also... where are these mysterious mob pages? If I knew the exact name of the mobs or the rifts I'd just go stick what I know there but I cannot find them.Sulhir (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Well they don't exist yet. I'll fix that. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Done. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 01:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

4 Phases

Couldn't the first phase have been the earthquakes? So there is no mysterious 4th phase? -- Ecpyrosis (talk) 08:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

I doubt it seeing it's been going on for some time now Alchemic Warrior of Travels (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

The problem with that interpretation is the second sentence of the quote -- "We're on the first [stage of the event]" -- which was said after the rifts appeared. — foxlit (talk) 11:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

I suspect that we've got the third/fourth phases combined: The quest chain comprises the third phase and the invasion proper comprises the fourth (with the bonus bosses). --k_d³ 23:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)