Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
Wowpedia
Wowpedia
274,795
pages
in: Votes in progress

Talk: Barthilas US

Back to page
Sign in to edit
(Voted on Jammno's removal)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Pcj|Pcj]] ([[User talk:Pcj|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Pcj|C]]){{#ifeq:{{{1|}}}|time|  20:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)|}} 20:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)|}}
  
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Pcj|Pcj]] ([[User talk:Pcj|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Pcj|C]]){{#ifeq:{{{1|}}}|time|  20:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)|}} 20:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)|}}
 
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Twinklestar|Twinklestar]] 13:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)|}}
  
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Twinklestar|Twinklestar]] 13:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)|}}
  +
{{vote|Yes|[[User:Impian|Impian]] 03:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)|I'll vote Yes, agreeing with Tyka. Sky2042 points out that if the comment was rewritten with a NPOV it might be acceptable - on the other hand, when I first clcked on the ytmnd.com link it was a bit of a LOL moment. If we start documenting Player Characters / Players that are "famous" because they have an ytmnd.com link we'd potentially start polluting the page with more self-promoting material. Can I suggest this Jammno material is more appropriate in his User page, and if he wants to link to the Barthilas page he can be categorise his user page in the same way the Soj and Purevil pages are categorised? }}
  +
   
 
;<font color="#CC4444">No</font>: <!-- Add: {{vote|No|~~ ~~| ...your notes or leave empty... }} (recombine the "~"s)-->
  
;<font color="#CC4444">No</font>: <!-- Add: {{vote|No|~~ ~~| ...your notes or leave empty... }} (recombine the "~"s)-->

Revision as of 03:07, 6 July 2007

NeXus "endgame"

Bioform, you reckon NeXus is an endgame raiding guild? Because ZG raiding guilds are not on the progression sticky in the realm forums, I chose not to put them with the other raiding guilds.--Zamael 20:17, 23 December 2006 (EST)

Bioform, you took out the note about Soj, which I think is fair because it doesn't sound very Neutral. But the inclusion of a screenshot link should make it "factual", no? --Zamael 20:17, 23 December 2006 (EST)

I did what now? I don't recall removing anything about Soj... Anyways, at the time I made some changes NeXus WAS running MC. But that was a while ago now.. --Bioform
Ahh don't worry about it Bioform. I guess TBC has changed a lot of things, and it's now fairly clear cut which guilds are raiding Karazhan and which ones aren't. On a related note, Boetick has deleted the "Jammno" note lol! I thought it was kinda funny but meh, it was kind of messy and out of character.--Zamael 06:49, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Dusk Till Dawn

to Treebranch/Gaffs of Dusk Till Dawn ... I know Dusk Till Dawn is a bunch of transferees from another realm with a couple of extra native Barthilas guys. I go to the website you listed http://dusktilldawn.guildporal.com/ and http://www.dusktilldawn.guildporal.com/ but instead I get some kind of advertising page. If you haven't noticed, the Wiki contributors have split up the raiding guilds and the casual guilds, but you have completely ignored what it says. Originally I listed the guilds based on the guild progression thread ... which Dusk till Dawn is not on. --Zamael 19:18, 10 January 2007 (EST)

I LOL'ed when I realised Treebranch misspelled the URL for his guild site. Fixed for the Dusk Till Dawn guys. --Zamael 21:03, 11 January 2007 (EST)

Jammno

"Barthilas currently houses the famous WoW player Jammno." I ROFL-ed at this a little. Kind of self-promotion, but it is sort of factual. I say it stays because it adds "Character" to an otherwise dull and boring page. LOL. --Zamael 22:35, 27 December 2006 (EST)

How do i report jammno or something to stop his posting his self-promoting garbage on this page over and over again? --Boetick.
LOL Boetick ... yah it is a bit of a drag. Here's the vandalism page, but hmm I guess the admins will decide for certain if it's vandalism. http://www.wowwiki.com/Vandalism --Zamael 02:57, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
It's not vandalism in and of itself. But him subsequently removing himself from the reported vandals list surely is (see User talk:Jammno. If you want to block him from re-adding the "famous player Jammno" bit once his ban is over, I suggest starting a vote about it here. Results of vote outcomes are enforceable. I will not be monitoring this page for responses; I may be reached via my talk page. Mikk (T) 10:13, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

Jammno Vote

Icon-question-48x48 This is a proposal and requires a vote to be accepted or declined.
  • Please vote below after you have reviewed the proposal.

I would like to ban jammno from constantly editing this page with his self-promoting garbage such as "Barthilas currently houses the famous WoW player Jammno. Jammno is known WoWwide for his famous "WTB Love" post that sparked over one million pageviews. The original post can be seen at: jammno.ytmnd.com He is AKA AngelFlonne, and his paladin, who is known to be a Dwarf Female in all BoE epics. The name is currently unknown." Noone knows or cares who he is and its clogging up our realm page.


Icon-question-48x48 A vote is in progress!
  • A consensus must be reached by voting before any action is taken.
  • If one side outnumbers the other by five votes for three days, that side is declared the winner.
To vote
Click [Edit] in the upper-right hand corner of the votes section, and add your vote in one the following methods (note that not all votes will have Yes/No options):
  • {{vote|Yes|~~~~|optional comment}}
or
  • {{vote|No|~~~~|optional comment}}
Then click Save page and you are done!
Replace |~~~~| with |sig=~~~~|| if you have a complicated signature!
To discuss the vote
Click [Edit] in the upper-right hand corner of the comments section.
The voting process
See Wowpedia:Voting policy for full details.
Make the following changes based on the outcome:
  • If you are adding the winning vote, or notice that one side is in fact winning:
    1. Change {{Vote/Vote}} on this talk page to {{Vote/Closing}}
  • If Yes has won, and 3 days have passed
    1. Change {{Vote/Closing}} on this talk page to {{Accepted}}
    2. Make the change suggested in the proposal.
  • If No has won, and 3 days have passed
    1. Change {{Vote/Closing}} on this talk page to {{Declined}}
    2. Do not remove the votes!
  • If necessary, you may archive votes to Server talk:Barthilas US/Archivevote.

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes Boetick 10:33, 7 May 2007 (EDT) - (See above - Boetick.)
  2. Yes Tyka 10:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC) - (If he was that famous someone else would have added him.)
  3. Yes Pcj (T•C) 20:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC) - ()
  4. Yes Twinklestar 13:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC) - ()
  5. Yes Impian 03:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC) - (I'll vote Yes, agreeing with Tyka. Sky2042 points out that if the comment was rewritten with a NPOV it might be acceptable - on the other hand, when I first clcked on the ytmnd.com link it was a bit of a LOL moment. If we start documenting Player Characters / Players that are "famous" because they have an ytmnd.com link we'd potentially start polluting the page with more self-promoting material. Can I suggest this Jammno material is more appropriate in his User page, and if he wants to link to the Barthilas page he can be categorise his user page in the same way the Soj and Purevil pages are categorised?)


No
  1. No Jammno 03:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC) - (I'm more famous than Copperfield, and less famous than Leeroy. I should stay. I have my own WoW trading card for Christ sake!)

Comments

It's interesting to note that Jammno has his own trading card. Link please? It seems like the community isn't appreciative of mentions of Jammno on the page. Impian 06:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Googled his name in combination with warcraft, trading, and card. There were no links to a Blizzard sponsored website in any of the responses. However, his notability on ytmnd.com is asserted, and that should probably be left in with a npov, rather than his biased editing. I have removed his last edit for the time being. --User:Sky2042/Sig 07:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


Community content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms