I was wondering should I add how the GLF temporarily liberated Gilneas? Rimor Conscientia (talk) 17:50, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
- GLF?
(Sssss/Slithered) 20:39, September 11, 2010 (UTC) - Gilneas Liberation Front.--SWM2448 20:59, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Why can't we consider the war of GLF against the Forsaken part of the Invasion of Gilneas? -- G.L.F. High Commander (talk) 09:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- It's mentioned in the aftermath section. Do you have something else in mind? --Bellocois (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- I mean why is it in the aftermath? Maybe it can be just second phase of the Invasion of Gilneas, or do we mean under the "Invasion of Gilneas" only the Worgen starting experience questline? G.L.F. High Commander (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is the aftermath cause Invasion is always the begining of any War. Since the invasion part has concluded now it's the war for Gilenas. For instance Tol Barad is the target of the attack to become a stagging ground for the Horde forces during the Gilneas war. Same goes for the Battle for Gilneas
Encaitar 
18:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, of course, an invasion is a beginning of any war, but that doesn't mean that the Invasion and the War are separate parts of the story. If now Gilneas is a contested territory, the Invasion of Gilneas must end on the part where the war ended and none of the sides gained utter cotrol over Gilneas. And if GLF temporarily liberated Gilneas, then it is an important part of the whole war. Am I right? G.L.F. High Commander (talk) 09:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes but this article describes the so called Worgen Starting Experience and not the whole war. Also they didn't liberate it alone either. It was the 7th Legion under command of Halford Wyrmbane (which can be seen standing atop of the gnomish submarine's deck in one of the Silverpine Forsaken quests) that actualy did. Gilneas Front was actualy waiting for the to arrive, because until then they were on even ground with the Forsaken forces. Encaitar 17:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- That was the very question I was asking from the beginning: is the Invasion of Gilneas simply another name for the Worgen Starting Experience or not! If yes, then yes, the GLF activities are the aftermath which will be described as either another article or simply will be part of the Alliance-Horde war. G.L.F. High Commander (talk) 16:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes but this article describes the so called Worgen Starting Experience and not the whole war. Also they didn't liberate it alone either. It was the 7th Legion under command of Halford Wyrmbane (which can be seen standing atop of the gnomish submarine's deck in one of the Silverpine Forsaken quests) that actualy did. Gilneas Front was actualy waiting for the to arrive, because until then they were on even ground with the Forsaken forces.
- Yes, of course, an invasion is a beginning of any war, but that doesn't mean that the Invasion and the War are separate parts of the story. If now Gilneas is a contested territory, the Invasion of Gilneas must end on the part where the war ended and none of the sides gained utter cotrol over Gilneas. And if GLF temporarily liberated Gilneas, then it is an important part of the whole war. Am I right? G.L.F. High Commander (talk) 09:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is the aftermath cause Invasion is always the begining of any War. Since the invasion part has concluded now it's the war for Gilenas. For instance Tol Barad is the target of the attack to become a stagging ground for the Horde forces during the Gilneas war. Same goes for the Battle for Gilneas
- I mean why is it in the aftermath? Maybe it can be just second phase of the Invasion of Gilneas, or do we mean under the "Invasion of Gilneas" only the Worgen starting experience questline? G.L.F. High Commander (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
