(Created page with "{{Stub/NPC}} <!-- [[Image:|thumb|]] -->{{npcbox | name = Karn Cragcare | image = | title = Stable Master | level = 50 | type = | faction = | city = | race = Dark Iron...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Why was the Pandaren April Fools section readded without a comment? As already stated in the page the RPG section is just a rewording of and an update of the information found in the April Fools joke. So basicly we now have the same info twice on this page and the April fools section on this page and on the April Fools page.--[[User:LemonBaby|LemonBaby]] ([[User talk:LemonBaby|talk]]) 10:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | {{Stub/NPC}} |
||
| − | <!-- [[Image:|thumb|]] |
||
| − | -->{{npcbox |
||
| − | | name = Karn Cragcare |
||
| − | | image = |
||
| − | | title = Stable Master |
||
| − | | level = 50 |
||
| − | | type = |
||
| − | | faction = |
||
| − | | city = |
||
| − | | race = Dark Iron Dwarf |
||
| − | | creature = Humanoid |
||
| − | | sex = |
||
| − | | location = [[Searing Gorge]] |
||
| − | }} |
||
| − | '''Karn Cragcare''' is a level 50 [[Stable Master]] located at [[Iron Summit]] in the [[Contested]] territory of [[Searing Gorge]]. |
||
| + | :[[Wowpedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle]]. Edit summaries are not a good place for discussion. It only ''seems'' that the RPG section is a rewording. It is two similar bits picked out. I put that comment there, not expecting that it would be used against itself. The April Fools info is fully transcribed, but I feel that it should be distributed to its respective topics as well. Both the RPG and the April Fools bits are useless, but they show the evolution of the concept, and used to be all the lore that we had.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 15:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::I see your point, but the evolution of the pandaren concept shouln't be shown by copy and paste two sources. Another concern is that the pandaren do have a "image problem" as a April Fools joke race. Adding the joke under their empires history as a source might not help. The evolution of their concept and their joke-history are already [[History of pandaren in Warcraft|covered on another page]]. BTW Sometimes I might sound harsher then I want because I'm not a native english speaker. --[[User:LemonBaby|LemonBaby]] ([[User talk:LemonBaby|talk]]) 16:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | See [[List of Searing Gorge NPCs]]. |
||
| + | :::The page you linked does not show how the lore itself evolved, just meta-information on the pandaren.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 18:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | ==External links== |
||
| − | {{Elinks-NPC|47934}} |
||
| + | ::::Nevertheless shouldn't this page be about how the pandaren lore evolved. I think that this is very interesting, but this kind of information should either be added on the [[pandaren]] page or on the [[History of pandaren in Warcraft]] page.--[[User:LemonBaby|LemonBaby]] ([[User talk:LemonBaby|talk]]) 18:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | [[Category:Dark Iron Dwarf]] |
||
| + | |||
| − | [[Category:Stable masters]] |
||
| + | :::::Ideally, this should be a page about the Pandaren Empire. There used to be two similar but mutually exclusive mentions of it, one of which was a joke, the other non-canon. If I could, I would shove the two old entries together, but it would contradict itself with every line. It would also be against out policy to shove RPG-sourced info into a corner, despite Metzen saying at BlizzCon 2011 that he may have been too hasty making it all non-canonical. Now, the versions presented before seem to have been scrapped, but I don't think that the old bits should be removed. The joke is more "canon" than the RPG lore as it stands.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 20:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | [[Category:Searing Gorge NPCs]] |
||
Revision as of 20:57, 28 October 2011
Why was the Pandaren April Fools section readded without a comment? As already stated in the page the RPG section is just a rewording of and an update of the information found in the April Fools joke. So basicly we now have the same info twice on this page and the April fools section on this page and on the April Fools page.--LemonBaby (talk) 10:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Wowpedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Edit summaries are not a good place for discussion. It only seems that the RPG section is a rewording. It is two similar bits picked out. I put that comment there, not expecting that it would be used against itself. The April Fools info is fully transcribed, but I feel that it should be distributed to its respective topics as well. Both the RPG and the April Fools bits are useless, but they show the evolution of the concept, and used to be all the lore that we had.--SWM2448 15:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, but the evolution of the pandaren concept shouln't be shown by copy and paste two sources. Another concern is that the pandaren do have a "image problem" as a April Fools joke race. Adding the joke under their empires history as a source might not help. The evolution of their concept and their joke-history are already covered on another page. BTW Sometimes I might sound harsher then I want because I'm not a native english speaker. --LemonBaby (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Nevertheless shouldn't this page be about how the pandaren lore evolved. I think that this is very interesting, but this kind of information should either be added on the pandaren page or on the History of pandaren in Warcraft page.--LemonBaby (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ideally, this should be a page about the Pandaren Empire. There used to be two similar but mutually exclusive mentions of it, one of which was a joke, the other non-canon. If I could, I would shove the two old entries together, but it would contradict itself with every line. It would also be against out policy to shove RPG-sourced info into a corner, despite Metzen saying at BlizzCon 2011 that he may have been too hasty making it all non-canonical. Now, the versions presented before seem to have been scrapped, but I don't think that the old bits should be removed. The joke is more "canon" than the RPG lore as it stands.--SWM2448 20:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)