Talk:World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria

Name

Mists of Pandaria? Are you sure? Are you sure that they are going to sell this expansion, with the chinises problems? --Kandooww ^^ (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

They already dealt with China.

The pandaren originally had a Japanese appearance, using samurai-style armor and weapons. After a negative reaction by many in China, who regard that animal as their national heirloom (indeed, wild pandas only exist in China), they were redesigned with Chinese-style clothing.

Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (^talk/_contribz) 19:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Final Boss

"Unlike all previous expansions, it will not contain a main antagonist. " So there wont be any final boss? Was it mentioned on Blizzcon?--TheMordecay (talk) 15:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

No main antagonist, does not mean no big boss :

• Mantid have a thousand-year cycle of aggression who started earlier
• Mogu are the former slavior of the pandaren and intend to take back Pandaria
• Sha would most likely have a big big sha

Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (^talk/_contribz) 15:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

From what I gather, there is no one leader of the evils of Pandaria.--SWM2448 17:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

From the three groups I quoted, two are empire and they do not have a leader? >_<

Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (^talk/_contribz) 17:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I think in the direction this expansion is going we're going too see alot of Alliance Vs. Horde even more than Cataclysm. Maybe Blizzard wants too make a pvp expansion. MoneygruberTheGoblinChieftain of the Gentleman Tribe(talk contribs) 17:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

By "no big boss" Blizzad meant there will be no Illidan/Lich King/DW central antagonist but rather seprate and smaller ones like Ragnaros/Nefarian/C'thun/Kel'thuzad, each havig his/her arc etc... I'm not sure if that's the best idea to contain that many threats though on the Island with lo and behold... 4 zones... Encaitar 17:41, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

You're all wrong... the villain is the horde and the alliance--Ashbear160 (talk) 17:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

We were talking of a "pve antagonist" Ashy

Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (^talk/_contribz) 18:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

It is very possible that the last 'boss' of the Expansion would be a Horde Racial Leader for the Alliance (for example, you have to kill Sylvanas' Val'kyr in her base then finally kill her), and a Alliance Racial Leader for the Horde (for example, you have to defeat Velen by finding the 'evil' he forsees and unleashed it upon him). This is mainly due to the fact that this Pandaria will be mostly inhabited by neautral Pandas with no particularily interesting boss. But this is all speculation on my part. --Illidarí (talk) 18:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I hope it will never happend :D Or at least kill useless leader would be fine, but I'd prefer to kill a new enemy who should rise as a MoP continued by patches. --TheMordecay (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

This expansion was just announced recently and we've only seen a little bit of In-Game. Blizzard might not even know what antagonists there may be yet. We will likely be completely surprised. MoneygruberTheGoblinChieftain of the Gentleman Tribe(talk contribs) 18:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion Blizzard must have some ideas, they just haven't tell us about him (her). Maybe in lore q/a we will learn who will be an antagonist.--TheMordecay (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Going back to the racial leaders as last bosses... if they did that, I'd hope Alliance get to kill Gallywix, and Horde get to kill... hmm, lets go with Garrosh. =P Sssssssssssssssssssssssss For Pony! (^Sssss/_Slithered) 01:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)