Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
   
 
:I doubt any of them would come back and start trouble with the powers that they still currently wield, and I agree that if they want to come back and become active again that the powers can easily be restored. So I see no issue with just cleaning up a bit and really show active and new users who is still around and able to help them. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 05:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:I doubt any of them would come back and start trouble with the powers that they still currently wield, and I agree that if they want to come back and become active again that the powers can easily be restored. So I see no issue with just cleaning up a bit and really show active and new users who is still around and able to help them. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 05:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
::If the inactive Administrators go, then they should at least be noted somewhere for posterity, along with Adys. Possibly Fandyllic and Kirkburn too, because even bad blood does not negate what they have contributed. I have no opinion on this beyond giving credit to past admins. It would be a bit mean to demote them, but they are gone.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 05:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:52, 22 October 2010

Forums: Village pump → One time de-administrate

I've been keeping tabs on the number of administrators which have been responsive about the recent move, and was thinking that there are a few administrators on/from WoWWiki which have not been responsive on the forum thread about moving, or on the administrator email list, or have not had a presence on IRC. This leads me to suggest that they should be deopped here, with community consensus to do so.

I am not against including an automatic reopping for them, if they choose to become active again, but I am gravely doubtful that such will occur. This condition would also be dependent on community consensus.

This suggestion is not intended to set a precedent, but merely to clear a bit of cruft from the ranks, when it is the ideal time to be able to point clearly to who the administrators are. I'll note that many of these suggested contributed greatly at some point, as well.

The admins:

If my reasoning is requested for this list (or those not included), I shall provide it. Thoughts? --Sky (talk) 05:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

I doubt any of them would come back and start trouble with the powers that they still currently wield, and I agree that if they want to come back and become active again that the powers can easily be restored. So I see no issue with just cleaning up a bit and really show active and new users who is still around and able to help them. SnakeSssssssssssssssssssssssss Coobra sig3For Pony! (Sssss/Slithered) 05:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
If the inactive Administrators go, then they should at least be noted somewhere for posterity, along with Adys. Possibly Fandyllic and Kirkburn too, because even bad blood does not negate what they have contributed. I have no opinion on this beyond giving credit to past admins. It would be a bit mean to demote them, but they are gone.--SWM2448 05:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)